 |  |  |
 |
| |
Defending software that performed as promised. A software company was sued by a customer after he used the company´s cost estimating software. The software itself was found to have functioned perfectly. The customer eventually dropped the case, but only after considerable legal expenses were incurred by the software company. Indemnity Paid: $0 Defense Cost Paid: $175,000
|
| |
More... |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
New Threats |
| |
|
| |
Recent laws governing
employment have opened the doors to a relatively new
category of potential adversary for Directors &
Officers - its own workforce. Laws such as the Americans
With Disabilities Act of 1990, the Civil Rights Act
of 1991, and the Family And Medical Leave Act of 1993
have contributed to a dramatic increase in claims involving
not only wrongful termination, but also discrimination
and sexual harassment. These laws are often poorly written
and vague, resulting in considerable time and money
expended in each case being interpreted by the courts.
Unfortunately, statistics are indicating that plaintiffs
are prevailing more times than not. In any case, it
is an expensive road to travel for the defense. |
|
| |
| |
D&O Insurance |
| Ever since entry of
domestic Directors & Officers Liability Insurance
in the 1960’s, there has been a lack of uniformity
of policy terms and conditions. There is no standard
form of D&O coverage, and at this time there are
over 40 different insurers writing D&O insurance,
and over twice that many different basic D&O policies.
Unlike many types of insurance, where a price comparison
may be made based on similar forms of coverage, D&O
policies must be analyzed and understood if they are
to meet the expectations of the Directors & Officers
as well as the business entity.
As much of importance in understanding what IS covered
by D&O, it is also important to understand what
is NOT covered by D&O.
|
|
|
|
| |
Common Exclusions in
Directors & Officers Insurance |
 |
| |
|
 |
- Arising out of the Directors,
Officers, or Company gaining in fact any profit or
advantage to which they were not legally entitled.
- Arising out deliberate fraudulent,
dishonest, or criminal acts
- Bodily Injury or Property Damage
- Discharge of Pollutants
- Acts committed in the capacity of Director for any
Outside Entity
- Acts committed as Director of a Subsidiary that
occurred prior to acquisition of the Subsidiary
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
Directors & Officers Liability |
|
Overview and Current D&O Market Trends |
 |
|
| |
Who Needs Directors and Officers Liability
Insurance? |
 |
| Liability insurance for the errors, omissions,
and other wrongful acts of directors and officers has been
available since the early 1960’s. Since that time, the
increase in public awareness and expectations, and the more
litigious nature of society, have resulted in a virtual explosion
of litigation against corporate managers as well as judicial
analysis of the conduct and standards applicable to Directors
& Officers. The result is that Directors & Officers
are frequently being “second guessed” by the courts |
| |
| |
| |
Obligations of Directors &
Officers |
 |
Essentially, Directors & Officers are
considered to have a duty of care, whereby they follow the
“prudent person rule”, make informed decisions,
perform in good faith, and act in the best interest of the
company. They also have a duty of loyalty that includes no
furthering of personal interests and refraining from personal
action damaging to the corporation. Finally, they have a duty
of obedience to perform duties within the corporate charter/by-laws
and act in accordance with all laws, statutes and regulations
pertaining to their industry.
Breach of any of these obligations can incur personal liability
to the individual Director or Officer involved as well as
an allocation of blame to the other Directors & Officers
on the board, possibly extending to the corporation itself
(80% of lawsuits now also name the corporate entity as a defendant.)
|
| |
| |
| |
Common Allegations Against
Directors & Officers |
 |
Most allegations involve decisions, acts,
errors or omissions that have lowered stock values, compromised
competitive industry position, wasted corporate assets, or
overlooked significant growth or investment opportunities.
These can result in financial injury to stockholders, employees,
investors, and any other third party.
In the past, Directors & Officers were somewhat protected
from liability due to the business judgment rule, particularly
in the question of duty of care. That is, they acted in the
best interest of the company and with due care, honest and
reasonable belief, good faith and without a conflict of interest.
Today, the judgment rule has lost much of its effect. |
| |
|
|
| |
Typical Plaintiffs |
According to a 1996 survey by Watson Wyatt
Company, there are six major sources of Directors & Officers
lawsuits. Those plaintiffs, and the basis of the suits, are
listed as follows
| 1. |
Stockholders
|
| |
 |
Inadequate/inaccurate
disclosure |
 |
Dishonesty/fraud |
 |
Financial reporting |
 |
Disappointing financial performance |
 |
Fiduciary duty/gross negligence |
 |
Stock or other public offerings |
 |
Bid or threat by another company
for takeover |
|
| 2. |
Employees |
| |
 |
Wrongful Termination
(this is the single most frequent claim!) |
 |
Harassment |
 |
Defamation |
 |
Breach of Employment Contract |
|
| 3. |
Customers/Clients
|
| |
 |
Dishonesty/Fraud
|
|
| 5. |
Other Third
Party |
| |
 |
Environmental Public
Activists |
|
| 6. |
Government
Agencies |
| |
 |
EPA |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
 |